Time Cube disproofs part one

2007-03-06T16:55:00.000-08:00

We are all well aware that it's on factual basis that the Time Cube is imaginary and none of it's principles are coherent to anything we can universally observe, one of these things includes the claim of a "four simeltaneous 24 hour single earth rotation" in other words, there are exactly four complete 24 hour days on every side of the globe each time the earth makes it's rotational pattern, but is this logical to presume?

Here we have an embedded You Tube video featuring the constructs of this concept according to the Time Cube doctrine, which appeared in an episode of "Super Nova", whatever that may be:

If this claim were true, we should expect a 24 hour day on our side of the globe to be a full 96 hours, given the simple mathematical equation: 24 x 4 = 96, in algebra terms: h (hours) x r
(rotations) = d (days), but the simple fact is that we don't have a 96 hour day based on a 60 minute per hour counting system. If Cubics wanted to use a more correct analogy, they could say that every six hours is a day and therefore we have four days within each rotation, but the problem about this is that 6 hours only consist of one average time period within the consistency of a full complete day. Given that there are four periods of the day (morning, midday, sundown, midnight) we therefore use another mathematical model to assert this as true: 24/4 = 6, being that this is an absolute established non-disputable mathematical fact, each passing period of the day is by 6 hours, and not according to Cubic time, which would be 24 hours.

Another logical question to ask is why would it be any different? We base our time length in a full day equivalent to a rotation of earth, (r = d ), how can we theorize alternatively by saying that the time we've measured countlessley again and again is actually four times this average time? Every passing day begins with the sun rising on our global side and with the sun setting, and it takes no mathematician to realize that we have clocked this area of time for thousands of years and it still comes up as 24 hours total, there is no other way to count it, unless you were somehow to squeeze 96 hours into the time frame of one day making it seem as though it truely is 96 hours. In order to do this however, we would need to change the length of an hour depending on how many minutes each would consist of, so Time Cube may actually have an interesting idea in mind, but it cannot be validated using 60 minutes to account for every single hour of the day, because we'd still get a 24 hour time period in which we can anticipate the exact return of the sun at sunrise. Therefore Time Cube is errant and this is a provided major disproof that must be answered too by the Cubic apologists, otherwise this cult has little success in gaining any followers after the death of the supposed Gene Ray.

Of course the head leading Cubic apologist Richard Janzarki has been made aware of this mathematical and logical evidence against his belief and has defended it with his rather poor rebuttal:

" if you divide a 24 hour day into four SEQUENTIAL parts they would amount to on average 6 hours each. But the four simultaneous days are not sequential: rather, they are SIMULTANEOUS. Thus, all four of them occupy the full 24 hour timespan, occurring concurrently with each other. Indeed, Time Cube is rationally proven true. "

Richard will have to come up with a better response seeing as they don't directly address the issue head on and instead we come to the faultering "Time Cube is true no matter what you say" fundamentalism, which already reveals that Cubic believers rely on blind faith and nothing more or less, what's even worse is that in the moment of crituiquing Time Cube it is similiar to that of trying to convince a brick wall that it's red and white all over.

Introduction

2007-03-03T16:04:00.000-08:00

Hello there and welcome to the Gene Ray Seminar blog! Many of you might be familiar with other such familiar groups such as the Jesus Seminar and if you also haven't heard the Buddha Seminar, headed by David Wood, here we are the Gene Ray Seminar, and, just as these other seminars, we will examine the actual claims behind believers who wish to proclaim Gene Ray as the "wisest human."

The Gene Ray Seminar explores important questions with factual answers and investigative research and theories, we will probe into issues such as "What does Gene Ray really think of himself?", "Is Gene Ray the 'Cubic Messiah'?" or perhaps even more anticipating "Does Gene Ray even exist?" These difficult questions will be answered by the Gene Ray Seminar, we also recommend to you that you join alongside the ICA (International Cubic Alliance) organization.

The Gene Ray Seminar Blog

Time Cube disproofs part one

Introduction